0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

´ëÇк´¿ø °£È£Á¶Á÷ ±ÕÇü ¼º°úÁöÇ¥ÀÇ ÀûÇÕ¼º °ËÁõ

Balanced Scorecard for Performance Measurement of a Nursing Organization in a Korean Hospital

Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing 2008³â 38±Ç 1È£ p.45 ~ 54
KMID : 0806120080380010045
È«À±¹Ì ( Hong Yoon-Mi ) - °üµ¿´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ °£È£Çаú

Ȳ°æÀÚ ( Hwang Kyung-Ja ) - °üµ¿´ëÇб³ ¸íÁöº´¿ø °£È£ºÎ
±è¹ÌÀÚ ( Kim Mi-Ja ) - ½ÃÄ«°íÀϸ®³ëÀÌ´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ
¹Úâ±â ( Park Chang-Gi ) - ½ÃÄ«°íÀϸ®³ëÀÌ´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to develop a balanced scorecard (BSC) for performance measurement of a Korean hospital nursing organization and to evaluate the validity and reliability of performance measurement indicators.

Method: Two hundred fifty-nine nurses in a Korean hospital participated in a survey questionnaire that included 29-item performance evaluation indicators developed by investigators of this study based on the Kaplan and Norton¡¯s BSC
(1992). Cronbach¡¯s alpha was used to test the reliability of the BSC. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis with a
structure equation model (SEM) was applied to assess the construct validity of the BSC.

Result: Cronbach¡¯s alpha of 29 items was .948. Factor analysis of the BSC showed 5 principal components (eigen value >1.0) which explained 62.7% of the total variance, and it included a new one, community service. The SEM analysis results showed that 5 components were significant for the hospital BSC tool.

Conclusion: High degree of reliability and validity of this BSC suggests that it may be used for performance measurements of a Korean hospital nursing organization. Future studies may consider including a balanced number of nurse managers and staff nurses in the study. Further data analysis on the relationships among factors is recommended
KeyWords
°£È£ ¼º°úÁöÇ¥, Ÿ´çµµ, ½Å·Úµµ
Nursing, Performance Evaluation, Indicators, Reliability, Validity
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
 
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
SCI(E) MEDLINE ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed